Improving Vascular Access Outcomes

Click to Download

Single Device Deployment

Multiple Device Deployment

References

*As compared to Angio-Seal^‡, ExoSeal^‡, FemoSeal^‡, InClosure^‡, MANTA^‡, Mynx^‡, PerQseal^‡, Vascade^‡, Velox CD^‡, X-Seal^‡. Data on file at Abbott.

1. Primary intention healing occurs where vessel wall edges are brought together, adjacent to each other. This can be achieved with suture, stitches, staples and clips.
2. For arterial sheath sizes greater than 8F, at least two devices and the pre-close technique are required.
3. For venous sheath sizes greater than 8F, at least one device and the pre-close technique are required.
4. Max. OD 26F/0.340 inches/8.62 mm; Max. OD 29F/0.378 inches/9.59 mm. Tests performed by and data on file at Abbott.
5. Time to hemostasis, ambulation and discharge applies to the arterial access.
6. Bhatt, Deepak L. et al. Successful “Pre-Closure” of 7Fr and 8Fr Femoral Arteriotomies With a 6Fr Suture-Based Device (The Multicenter Interventional Closer Registry). American Journal of Cardiology Vol 89. March 2002.
7. Mercandetti, Michael. Wound Healing and Repair. Medscape. WebMD, 02 April 2019. Web. January 15, 2020.
8. Perclose ProGlide™ Versus Surgical Closure Outcomes – Real World Evidence. Schneider, Darren B; Krajcer, Zvonimir; et al. LINC 2018.
9. The Use of the Perclose ProGlide™ Suture Mediated Closure (SMC) Device for Venous Access-Site Closure up to 24F Sheaths. Kar, Saibal; Hermiller, James; et al. CRT 2018.
10. Applies to arterial access.