SKIP TO CONTENT
About Abbott
Contact
International | eng
Country Language
Search

CARDIOVASCULAR

International | eng
Country Language

Stealth 360™

Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

Stealth 360 Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy Device
Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence for Stealth 360™ Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System

The Stealth 360™ Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) has been well-studied in over 4,800 patients and in more than 7,000 lesions with durable results.1 In the LIBERTY 360 trial, primary patency was 89.7% at 2 years in RC 2-3 patients2 and the 3-year freedom from major amputation was 88.6% in RC 6 patients.3
 

Stealth 360™ Peripheral OAS Clinical Studies

LIBERTY 360º

LIBERTY is the largest, contemporary, real-world study to evaluate procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of endovascular device interventions in patients with symptomatic lower extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD).4

Study Design4

  • Prospective, observational, multicenter study that includes any FDA-cleared or approved technology to treat claudication and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI).
  • 1,204 patients enrolled at 51 sites and were followed for up to five years. Four core labs were used for independent analysis.
  • Key endpoints: Procedural and lesion success, Major Adverse Events (MAEs), Duplex Ultrasound (DUS), Quality of Life (QoL), and Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
  • Key inclusion criteria: Rutherford classification (RC) 2 to 6, target lesion located within or extending into 10 cm above the medial epicondyle to the digital arteries (distal 1/3 of the SFA and below), and at least one lesion that can be treated with an endovascular device.5
Liberty 360 Study Design

Conclusion

Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) may be a reasonable treatment option across all Rutherford classes with durable results lasting to 3 years.4

  • High freedom from major amputation at 3 years across all Rutherford classes.4
  • In the OAS sub-analysis, freedom from major amputation rates at 3 years were even higher than in the full patient cohort.4
  • Improved Quality of Life by 30 days and maintained to 3 years across all Rutherford classes.4
  • High long-term patency rates through 2 years in RC 2-3.6
  • Improvement in mean number of wounds from 30 days to 2 years in RC 4-6.6

  Return to Top

CALCIUM 360º

A prospective, randomized, multi-center study that compared the acute and long-term results of Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) + Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) versus PTA alone in calcified below-the-knee (BTK) lesions.7

 

Key Takeaways7

  • Lower mean maximum balloon inflation pressure in OAS+PTA arm
  • Lower rate of major adverse events at 12-months in OAS+PTA arm

 

Study Design7

  • 50 Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) patients enrolled at 8 U.S. sites.
  • Patients randomized to either OAS+PTA (25 pts) or PTA alone (25 pts) and followed for 12 months.

 

Patient Population7

DemographicsOAS + PTA
(n=25)		PTA Alone
(n=25)		p-value
Mean Age70.7 ± 13.471.8 ± 10.90.75
Male/Female68%/32%60%/40%0.77
Diabetic Type 14%0%1.00
Diabetic Type 268%56%0.56
Renal Insufficiency (GFR <90)25%24%1.00
Smoker (current or previous)60%60%1.00
CAD44%56%0.57
Hypertension84%84%1.00
Dyslipidemia83%72%0.50

Study Results7

Mean Maximum Balloon Inflation Pressure (atm)

p=0.001

Diamondback 360 Calcium 360 Study Balloon Inflation

Rate of Bail-Out Stenting

p=0.44

Diamondback 360 Calcium 360 Study Bail Out Stenting

Freedom From Revascularization at 12 Months

p=0.14

Diamondback 360 Calcium 360 Study Revascularization Freedom

Freedom From Major Adverse Events at 12 Months

p=0.006

Diamondback 360 Calcium 360 Study Major Adverse Event Freedom

  Return to Top

TRUTH

A prospective, single-arm, single-center study using Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) to assess Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS)-related plaque modification of femoropopliteal lesions.8

 

Key Takeaways8

  • OAS modified the calcified component of the plaque burden (IVUS analysis).
  • Calcium reduction was responsible for 86% of lumen area increase (IVUS analysis).
  • Increase in minimum lumen area post-OAS (IVUS analysis).
  • Low mean maximum balloon inflation pressure post-OAS of 5.2 atm.

 

Study Design8

  • 25 patients enrolled at a single center.
  • Patients treated with OAS+Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and followed for 12 months.
  • IVUS images collected pre-OAS, post-OAS, and post-PTA (IVUS Core Lab).


Patient Population8

Baseline Characteristics(n=25)
Age70.4 ± 7.8 years
Gender (Male)19/25 (76.0%)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)70.9 ± 25.0
History of diabetes (Type I or II)18/25 (72.0%)
History of hyperlipidemia25/25 (100.0%)
History of hypertension25/25 (100.0%)
Smoker (current or former)21/25 (84.0%)
Rutherford classification3.0 ± 0.0


Study Results8

  • The mean maximum balloon inflation pressure was 5.2±1.2 atm.
  • Virtual histology IVUS analysis revealed at the maximum calcium ablation site that calcium reduction was responsible for 86% of the lumen area increase.
  • The minimum lumen area increased from 4.0 mm2 to 9.1 mm2 (P<0.0001).
     
Rutherford Classification (RC)Baseline (n=25)12-Month Follow-up (n=22)
Asymptomatic (RC 0)0 (0.0%)13 (59.1%)
Mild Claudication (RC 1)0 (0.0%)8 (36.4%)
Moderate Claudication (RC 2)0 (0.0%)1 (4.5%)
Severe Claudication (RC 3)25 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
ABI*0.74 ± 0.13 (n=22)0.95 ± 0.15 (n=21)

*Greater of posterior tibial or dorsalis pedis systolic pressure divided by maximum of left or right brachial systolic pressure.

p-value <0.001 for Rutherford Classifications and ABI

At 12 months, the freedom from target lesion revascularization rate was 91.8%, and ankle-brachial index and Rutherford classification improved significantly from baseline through follow-up.

 

  Return to Top

COMPLIANCE 360°

A prospective, randomized, multi-center study that compared the acute and long-term results of Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) + Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) versus PTA alone in calcified above-the-knee (ATK) lesions.9

 

Key Takeaways9

  • Lower mean maximum balloon inflation pressure in OAS+PTA arm.
  • Lower adjunctive stent rate in OAS+PTA arm.
  • OAS demonstrated reduced stenting with durable results out to 12 months versus PTA alone.

 

Study Design9

  • 50 patients enrolled at 9 U.S. sites.
  • Patients randomized to either OAS+PTA (25 pts) or PTA alone (25 pts) and followed for 12 months.

 

Patient Population9

ComorbidityOAS + PTA
(n=25)		PTA Alone
(n=25)		p-value
Mean Age ± SD68.0 ± 11.071.3 ± 10.50.27
Female gender, n (%)18 (72)16 (64)0.76
Non-Caucasian, n (%)9 (36)4 (16)0.19
Coronary artery disease, n (%)12 (48)16 (64)0.39
Diabetes, n (%)18 (72)10 (40)0.05
Hypertension, n (%)22 (88)18 (72)0.29
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)23 (92)21 (84)0.67
Smoker (current or former), n (%)22 (88)22 (88)>0.99

 

Study Results9

Mean Maximum Balloon Inflation Pressure (atm)

p<0.001

Diamondback 360 Compliance 360 Study Maximum Balloon Inflation

Adjunctive Stenting

p<0.001

Diamondback 360 Compliance 360 Study Adjunctive Stenting

Patency at 12 Months

p<0.99

Diamondback 360 Compliance 360 Study Patency at 12 Months

References

  1. Data on file at Abbott. Counts updated 06Jan2020 - subject to change (includes PAD I, PAD II, OASIS, CONFIRM, CALCIUM, COMPLIANCE, TRUTH, CLARITY, LIBERTY, OPTIMIZE, REACH PVI).
  2. Adams GL, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(5 Suppl):E188-E189.
  3. Giannopoulos S, et al. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27(5):714-725.
  4. Mustapha JA. LIBERTY 360 Trial 3-Year Update. Presented at AMP 2019.
  5. Adams GL, et al. Am Heart J. 2016;174:14-21.
  6. Mustapha JA. Late Breaking: LIBERTY 360 2-Year Update. Presented at AMP 2018.
  7. Shammas NW, et al. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(4):480-488.
  8. Babaev A, et al. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(7):188-194.
  9. Dattilo R, et al. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014;26(8):355-360.

MAT-2402041 v1.0

POLICIES & ADVISORIES
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
PATIENTS & CAREGIVERS
Abbott logo

Information contained herein for distribution outside the U.S. only.

CAUTION: These products are intended for use by or under the direction of a physician. Prior to use, reference the Instructions for Use, inside the product carton (when available) or online for more detailed information on Indications, Contraindications, Warnings, Precautions and Adverse Events.

Illustrations are artist's representations only and should not be considered as engineering drawings or photographs.

Unless otherwise specified, all product names appearing in this Internet site are trademarks owned by or licensed to Abbott, its subsidiaries or affiliates. No use of any Abbott trademark, trade name, or trade dress in this site may be made without the prior written authorization of Abbott, except to identify the product or services of the company. ™ Indicates a trademark of the Abbott group of companies. ‡ Indicates a third party trademark, which is property of its respective owner.

© 2025 Abbott. All Rights Reserved.

MAT-2001111 v8.0

Disclaimer

You are about to enter an Abbott country- or region-specific website. 

Please be aware that the website you have requested is intended for the residents of a particular country or countries, as noted on that site. As a result, the site may contain information on pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other products or uses of those products that are not approved in other countries or regions

Do you wish to continue and enter this website? 

YES

MAT-2305078 v1.0