Supera™ Stent

Results Matter. Platform Matters.

  Supera Stent

Unmatched 1-Year Patency & 3-Year Freedom From TLR

The Supera™ Stent has been studied in over 2,000 patients worldwide in the SUPERB trial and 16 retrospective studies. Notably, in all of the 17 studies, the Supera™ Peripheral Stent showed durable results with zero fractures at 1 year.1,4-19

superb Trial

At 1 year the Supera™ Stent demonstrated primary patency of 91% when nominally* deployed. At 3 years, freedom from targeted lesion revascularisation (tlr) was 94% when nominally* deployed.1
 

  91% patency at 1 year

patency (k-m) at 1 year

When nominally deployed*

  94% freedom from TLR at 3 years

freedom from tlr at 3 years

When nominally deployed*

*Nominal deployment is defined as the stent length upon deployment being within +/- 10% of the labelled stent length. This data is from a non-powered post-hoc analysis. K-M=Kaplan Meier.

Consistent Patency Regardless of Lesion Length

With some peripheral stents, increasing lesion lengths can lead to decreasing patency rates.20 The Supera™ Stent stands apart for its consistently high patency rates in lesions spanning lengths from 5.3 cm up to 28.0 cm.†
 

  consistently high patency rates

† Published data was included if lesion length and patency were both available.

Note: Results from different clinical trials are not directly comparable. Information provided for educational purposes only.

Excellent Results from Simple to Complex Lesions

Whether treating simple (tasc a&b) or complex (tasc c&d) lesions, the Supera™ Stent is associated with impressive, consistent patency performance data at 1 year.1-4

 

Simple
Simple lesionTrial/Studymunich registry2superb1
Lesion Length5.3cm7.8cm
TASC A&B Lesions100%94%
1-Yr
Patency
86.7%90.5%
SitesSingle CentreMulticentre (46 sites)
# Patients70264

 

Complex
Complex LesionTrial/Studyst. louis4supersub3
Lesion Length24cm28cm
TASC C&D Lesions78%100%
CTOsUnknown100%
1-Yr
Patency
85.6%94.1%
SitesSingle CentreSingle Centre
# Patients4834


TASC: Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus

REFERENCES

 
  1. Garcia L. et al., Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1259-1267.
  2. Treitl, K.M., et al. European Radiology.2017; 10.1007.
  3. Palena L.M. et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention.2016.
  4. Brescia AA. et al., J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1472-8
  5. George JC. et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):954-61.
  6. Montero-Baker M. et al., J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):1002-8.
  7. Scheinert D. et al., J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;18(6):745-52.
  8. Werner M. et al., EuroIntervention. 2014 Nov;10(7):861-8.
  9. San Norberto EM. et al., Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 May;41:186-195.
  10. Chan YC. et al., J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1201-9.
  11. Dumantepe M. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):240-246.
  12. Goltz JP. et al., J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;19(3):450-6.
  13. León LR Jr. et al., J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):1014-22.
  14. Myint M. et al., J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):433-41.
  15. Palena LM. et al., J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Oct;25(5):588-591.
  16. Scheinert D. et al., JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):65-71.
  17. Steiner S. et al., J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;23(2):347-55.
  18. Teymen B. et al., Vascular. 2018 Feb;26(1):54-61.
  19. Bhatt H. et al., Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):512-515.
  20. Shroë H. Superficial femoral artery PTA or stenting? 5-Year results. CIRSE 2011; Munich, Germany

MAT-2409315 v1.0