Xience™ Family of Drug Eluting Stents

THE WORLD'S LEADING DRUG-ELUTING STENTS (DES), WITH UNPARALLELED CLINICAL OUTCOMES1

Xience™ drug-eluting stents
Xience™ drug-eluting stents
Xience™ drug-eluting stents

     

Optimal Deliverability with XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent

Design elements with a proven ability to deliver with previous generations of XIENCE™ Stents, provide optimal deliverability for interventional cardiologists (ICs) encountering challenging lesions.

     

Catheter Enhancements

Unlike prior generations of XIENCE™ Stent, XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent has a seamless one-piece catheter shaft that optimizes pushability.2 In addition, the guide wire notch profile is reduced by 0.001”.3

Skypoint Stent

Optimal Deliverability

Data reveal optimal deliverability with XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent. This compares favorably with XIENCE Sierra™ Stent.4

Deliverability with XIENCE Skypoint Stent is 11% higher compared to XIENCE Sierra Stent.

Better Stent Retention

High stent retention helps prevent dislodgement and help ensure safe crossing, even when treating complex lesions. Testing reveals that XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent retention rates are better than those of Synergy and Resolute Onyx DES, reaching statistical significance.5

XIENCE Skypoint Stent performs better in stent retention tests compared to Synergy and Resolute Onyx drug-eluting stents.

Lower Crossing Forces with XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent6

Lower crossing forces can also aid in optimizing stent deliverability. Note that XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent crossing forces are significantly lower than those of Synergy and Resolute Onyx DES.

The crossing forces with XIENCE Skypoint Stent are significantly lower compared to Synergy and Resolute Onyx DES.

When using the XIENCE Skypoint™ 48-mm Stent, the hypotube has a 33% increase in wall thickness.7

The crossing forces with XIENCE Skypoint Stent are significantly lower compared to Synergy and Resolute Onyx DES.

Optimal Push Efficiency with XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent8

Testing confirms better push efficiency, revealing a 5% improvement for XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent compared to XIENCE Xpedition™ Stent.
Push Efficiency–48mm stents

    

Abbott’s Coronary Intervention Portfolio

References

  1. Zanchin C, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(17):1665-1675. Serruys P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:136-146. Shiomi H, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:637-647. Kufner S, et al. Circulation. 2019:139(3):325-333. Palmerini T, et al. Lancet. 2013;379:1393-1402. Bangalore S, et al. Circulation. 2012;125:2873-2891. Bangalore S, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(6):378-390. Pilgrim T, et al. Lancet. 2014;384:2111-2122. Pilgrim T, et al. Lancet. 2018;392:737-746. Data on file at Abbott.
  2. Data on file at Abbott—XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent compared with XIENCE Sierra™ Stent.
  3. Data on file at Abbott—XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent Product Specification.
  4. Tests performed and data on file at Abbott—3.0 x 18 mm or 3.0 x 20 mm stents tested using a simulated arterial model.
  5. Tests performed by and data on file at Abbott. XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent (3.0 x 18 mm) n=5, SYNERGY (3.0 x 20 mm) n=5, Resolute Onyx (3.0 x 18 mm) n=5.
  6. Tests performed by and data on file at Abbott. XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent (3.0 x 18 mm) n=5, SYNERGY (3.0 x 20 mm) n=5, Resolute Onyx (3.0 x 18 mm) n=5.
  7. Data on file at Abbott. Hypotube wall thickness information—XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent 0.004ʺ compared with XIENCE Xpedition™ Stent 0.003ʺ.
  8. Test performed by and data on file at Abbott. XIENCE Skypoint™ Stent compared with XIENCE Xpedition™ Stent – 3.0 x 48 mm stents tested.

MAT-2305700 V1.0